How to absolutely fail at social media

Phil Harper - Social Media Consultant -
July 14, 2009 Written by Phil Harper - Social Media Consultant Filed under Industry News, Social Media

There’s a dangerous thought that taking part in social media is confined to what you do and don’t write on your blog or twitter account… Guinness just got schooled by FAIL blog, that this thought is nowhere close to being true. Guinness’  first mistake was to post a world-record on their site “Most individuals killed in a terrorist attack” which was of course the attack on the twin towers in 2001, but instead of just stating the morbid record they enticed their readers to “break this record!”. Mistake.

If you post that on your website, and you are Guinness, you’d be naive to think that the internet ninjas who roam the interwebs seeking out these glaring failures would do anything other than call you out on it.

Enter FAIL Blog.

They picked it up, posted it to FAIL blog quite rightly highlighting the absolute failure of Guinness, check it out here.

fail

Cue panic

So it happened. Your brand image is out of your control and you’re receiving negative attention from the internet ninjas on that thing they call the interwebs. What do you NOT do? You do not, under ANY circumstances, send a threatening email to the blog in question demanding that your intellectual property be taken down from their site. Everyone and their nephew knows this. Suuuuurrreeely the people tasked with dealing with this sort of thing are fully aware of the streisand effect and the wrath of fury it will bring to your brand? Evidently not.

Enter mistake number two

Guinness sent the email, they pressed the button, they started the launch sequence and triggered the backlash bomb. The email you don’t send got sent. I wince with embarrassment for the “legal and business affairs” person who wrote this e-fail. The kind folks at FAIL blog made sure to implement damage limitations by removing their name, a nice touch…

the-guiness-email

The horror

It looks like it was written by a machine, a robot of the bureaucratic headquarters of Boring LTD. The howler Guinness made was actually an opportunity for a bit of creative cover up, a chance to hold their hands up and make it known they’d got it wrong and come out with some integrity and maybe, if they played their cards right, some free marketing. Instead they sent this dystopian nightmare of an email to FAIL Blog!? FAIL BLOG!? This is testament to the fact that every department of your business needs to be trained in social media. Guinness, send us nice chaps at Fluid an email, we’ll show you the ropes, we’ll hold your hand and point at the blogs you don’t send threatening emails to.

The response you should have expected

You should have expected that a blogger, desperate for content for his blog, would publish your email in its entirety. Check. You should have expected that the blogger sends back and publishes an email openly mocking your heavy handed response. Check. You most certainly have expected to see the Streisand effect lock its deathly jaws around your social reputation and crush it into nothingness. Shoulda coulda woulda. Fail fail fail.

OMG U FAIL SO HARD

4995 votes

EDITOR’S NOTE: This post is in response to an email FAIL Blog received from an attorney representing Guinness World Records Limited.

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thanks for writing us an email regarding the “Record Breaking Fail”. Unfortunately, douchebaggy cyber-bullying emails will only bring upon you more shame on your house. I am also resisting the urge to write this email in ALL CAPS.

I believe it is the duty of FAIL Blog(TM) to call out organizations when they encourage the public to do such things as “Break the record” for the “Most Individuals Killed In A Terrorist Act”. We firmly believe that our publication of your fail is protected under the concepts of fair use, commentary and non-trademark use. Please RTFM and we welcome you to teh interwebs.

Since we at FAIL Blog(TM) don’t have a legal defense department, we have complied with your request to remove the trademarked term and logo from the original image. We have used the “naughty bits filter” on the image to secure your naughty, naughty, trademark assertions. However, we have posted your email so that our audience can see why we had to remove the name of the failer from the image. I hope that this is the outcome you have expected as now NO ONE WILL EVER KNOW THAT GUINNESS WORLD RECORDS LIMITED HAS FAILED.

The full legal response can be read here: icanhaz.com/legalresponse

Cheers,
FAIL Blog

P.S.: This is what we think of your letter.

The aftermath of bad press:

  1. http://failblog.org/2009/07/08/record-breaking-fail/
  2. http://current.com/items/90410146_guinness-world-records-reaches-new-levels-of-fail.htm
  3. http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/13/guinness-world-records-reaches-new-levels-of-fail/
  4. http://www.techflash.com/Fail_Blog_vs_Guinness_World_Records_in_terrorist_blog_post50708862.html
  5. http://hawhat.tumblr.com/post/141160106/guinness-is-updated-with-their-failblogs
  6. http://search.twitter.com/search?q=guinness+fail

The conclusion

Don’t send the email. Send Fluid Creativity an email first, and we’ll save you from a PR disaster.

The Guinness Fail ticker


Embed it on your own site with this wonderous code snippet:

<script language=”javascript”>
/* widget config */
var jtw_search = ‘Guinness’; /* keywords or phrase to send to search.twitter.com and display */
var jtw_width = ‘auto’;
</script>
<script src=”http://tweetgrid.com/widget/widget.js” type=”text/javascript”></script>

Link:

  • They should have simply made a change to the system and then notified and thanked failblog. Perhaps if they'd done that and asked nicely for Failblog to remove or change the offending article, we wouldn't have even heard of all this. While the original "beat this record" fail was amusing, the fallout from their response has been humiliating.
  • Whilst I would agree on the points in general, I think this Guinness affair is more of a case of "emotional" response you frequently find on the web. And I'm interested in the point that was raised in one of the comments there re: whether the screengrab was photoshopped.

    How about interpreting that "break a record" phrase differently? Not like "break the record, blow up more people than they did on 9/11" but - "do you know of another terrorist attack where more people were killed?"

    This is the semantics and phraseology issue, and personally, I cannot hold Guinness entirely responsible. "Break this record" is clearly inserted by default, so there may be short-sightedness on the part of Guinness, but surely no bad intent. The issue with 9/11 is one of those to do with political correctness, and there is a very fine line between correctness and absurdity. FailBlog updated their entry, but did they suggest how Guinness should've rephrased "break the record" to avoid upsetting people?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest From The BlogRSS Feed

Categories

Archives

Tags

Blogroll

Tickle Your Fancy?

Call Us
0845 6588 373
Email Us
info@fluidcreativity.co.uk
Fax Us
0161 351 3549
Say Hello!

Accreditations

  • Fresh Digital Awards
  • Big Chip Awards
  • How-Do Awards
  • Google Adwords Qualified Professional
  • Manchester Digital
  • Best Search - Top SEO
  • Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce
  • Google Analytics Individual Qualification
  • Recommended Agency Register

Accessibility

Change text size: